Message boards : Number crunching : No Bonus?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
CTAPbIi Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications     | |
|
Host ID: 48707 | |
ID: 14066 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
|
MarkJ  Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications   | |
Host ID: 48707 I suspect but maybe GDF can check this out, but your wingman returned it after 6 days and so you have been given the lower of the two "granted" credits. Looking at some of your other wu it seems the wingmen have timed out/errored out or there isn't a wingman. ____________ BOINC blog | |
| ID: 14067 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
CTAPbIi Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
I suspect but maybe GDF can check this out, but your wingman returned it after 6 days and so you have been given the lower of the two "granted" credits. Looking at some of your other wu it seems the wingmen have timed out/errored out or there isn't a wingman. Oh... looks u r right. Saying frankly, I saw such story in the 1st time. I can say that majority of WUs I did either came with errors from some1 else either got time-out status. In this case there 2 questions to the project: - you they issued this WU for me? It looks it a wasting of time for one of the hosts (in this case - my time, coz I got it way later than that guy) - why I been penalized? I believe that it's not my fault that I got this WU or it took more time to complete this WU by some1 else. In my understanding in such cases we should get points separately... And once again: it's not a question about the points but I'd like to rise this question in order to think how we should avoid such stories in the future... ____________  | |
| ID: 14068 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : Number crunching : No Bonus?
