New batch KKi4

Message boards : Number crunching : New batch KKi4

Author	Message
Toni Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18862 - Posted: 7 Oct 2010 \| 17:21:36 UTC Last modified: 7 Oct 2010 \| 17:21:56 UTC
	Dears, this is the continuation of an experiment we'd like to publish soon. WUs are twice as large as the old "CAPBIND*" series.
	ID: 18862 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ftpd Send message Joined: 6 Jun 08 Posts: 152 Credit: 328,250,382 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18868 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 11:01:51 UTC - in response to Message 18862.
	Dear Toni, I have downloaded and processed already a few of this WU's. Also a few cancelled within 1 minute. Already known? Good luck and good weekend, ____________ Ton (ftpd) Netherlands
	ID: 18868 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Toni Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18870 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 12:58:33 UTC - in response to Message 18868.
	There should be nothing new with these WUs (except their length). By "cancelled" you mean that they failed?
	ID: 18870 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1620 Credit: 8,887,306,939 RAC: 19,859,836 Level Scientific publications	Message 18871 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 13:18:16 UTC - in response to Message 18870. Last modified: 8 Oct 2010 \| 13:20:21 UTC
	I had one this morning which has failed on two different machines so far: http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=1966290 (Edit: but I've had one successful run, on the same machine, and another is currently at about 60%)
	ID: 18871 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 20 Jul 08 Posts: 134 Credit: 23,657,183 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18872 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 13:29:53 UTC - in response to Message 18827.
	And a TONI_KK broken as well. stderr is this (my Linux): stderr out <core_client_version>6.10.17</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 98 (0x62, -158) </message> <stderr_txt> # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.34 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536150016 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 MDIO ERROR: read error for file "input.coor", byte number 0: expected to read number of atoms ERROR: file mdioload.cpp line 80: Unable to read bincoordfile 11:16:36 (3686): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> and this (the other Windows): stderr out <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code 98 (0x62) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" # Clock rate: 1.35 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 919994368 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 27 # Number of cores: 216 MDIO ERROR: read error for file "input.coor", byte number 0: expected to read number of atoms ERROR: file mdioload.cpp line 80: Unable to read bincoordfile called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> ____________ Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki
	ID: 18872 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ftpd Send message Joined: 6 Jun 08 Posts: 152 Credit: 328,250,382 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18873 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 13:57:09 UTC - in response to Message 18870.
	Dear Toni, They failed within 1 minute (10-15 seconds processing). ____________ Ton (ftpd) Netherlands
	ID: 18873 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18874 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 13:59:49 UTC - in response to Message 18871.
	I have finished 4 and my systems are running at least one. Reasonable performance compared to the other tasks. However I also got one immediate failure: 3105670 1965540 8 Oct 2010 4:12:47 UTC 8 Oct 2010 8:55:18 UTC Error while computing 2.48 0.95 0.00 --- ACEMD2: GPU molecular dynamics v6.11 (cuda31) Name f178r2-TONI_KKi4-0-200-RND1238_2 Workunit 1965540 Created 8 Oct 2010 3:32:44 UTC Sent 8 Oct 2010 4:12:47 UTC Received 8 Oct 2010 8:55:18 UTC Server state Over Outcome Client error Client state Compute error Exit status 98 (0x62) Computer ID 71363 Report deadline 13 Oct 2010 4:12:47 UTC Run time 2.484375 CPU time 0.953125 stderr out <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code 98 (0x62) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There are 2 devices supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 470" # Clock rate: 1.43 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 1341849600 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 14 # Number of cores: 112 # Device 1: "GeForce GTX 470" # Clock rate: 1.43 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 1341718528 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 14 # Number of cores: 112 SWAN: Using synchronization method 0 MDIO ERROR: read error for file "input.coor", byte number 0: expected to read number of atoms ERROR: file mdioload.cpp line 80: Unable to read bincoordfile called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 0.00480620718015305 Granted credit 0 application version ACEMD2: GPU molecular dynamics v6.11 (cuda31)
	ID: 18874 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Toni Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18877 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 18:53:23 UTC - in response to Message 18874.
	Hi, for those getting: byte number 0: expected to read number of atoms - it must have been a glitch in mass-WU creation, let them die. Richard - I think your other failure was on a mobile card.
	ID: 18877 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18878 - Posted: 8 Oct 2010 \| 19:08:27 UTC - in response to Message 18877.
	Thank you to everyone that reported this problem and thank you Toni for letting us know it is just a WU creation glitch. As these errors are immediate they will have almost no impact on peoples RAC. To date I have only had one such error - most KKi4 WU's run well.
	ID: 18878 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1620 Credit: 8,887,306,939 RAC: 19,859,836 Level Scientific publications	Message 18890 - Posted: 9 Oct 2010 \| 17:49:25 UTC
	One of my 9800GTs had a go at h230r2-TONI_KKi4-0-200-RND9586, but unfortunately crashed with an assertion failure at the bitter end, after more than 24 hours of work. C'est la vie.
	ID: 18890 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18893 - Posted: 9 Oct 2010 \| 20:08:52 UTC - in response to Message 18890.
	Richard, you took that blow well. Toni, perhaps Fermi-only long tasks would go down better; a failure after a few hours is no big deal but after a day it really bites, and not everyone is so understanding. I've now had 5 failures, but all under 10sec. 16 other KKi4 tasks ran well.
	ID: 18893 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Beyond Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18909 - Posted: 10 Oct 2010 \| 12:58:34 UTC - in response to Message 18893.
	Toni, perhaps Fermi-only long tasks would go down better; a failure after a few hours is no big deal but after a day it really bites, and not everyone is so understanding. I've now had 5 failures, but all under 10sec. 16 other KKi4 tasks ran well. My GTX 260/216 runs the TONI_KKi4 WUs well, in fact it runs everything well. The problem is with my three GT 240 cards. They won't run the TONI_KKi4 WUs. They don't like the TONI_HERGMETAXDOFE WUs either. They do run KASHIF_HIVPR, TONI_CAPBIND and IBUCH very well though.
	ID: 18909 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18910 - Posted: 10 Oct 2010 \| 13:50:32 UTC - in response to Message 18909.
	I have had 4 finish on a GT240, and just one that failed after 2.46sec. Vista x64, all 512MB DDR5 cards.
	ID: 18910 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 1 Apr 09 Posts: 58 Credit: 35,833,978 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18914 - Posted: 10 Oct 2010 \| 19:42:42 UTC - in response to Message 18910.
	One faulty WU , probably, as all hosts have failed on this one......?! That's the only faulty WU {or result?}, I've seen, sofar. It's meant to stay that way :) ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!
	ID: 18914 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 1 Apr 09 Posts: 58 Credit: 35,833,978 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 18918 - Posted: 12 Oct 2010 \| 15:34:16 UTC - in response to Message 18914.
	Found 2 WU's , computed by 4 hosts, which all failed, 2 still have to Report. h176r1-TONI_KKi4-0-200-RND5770 is giving problems as well!? The faults I've seen so far, all come from the x999y1-TONI_KKi4-0-200-RND5770, batch. Must be noticed by many others, concluding this from the # of INValid Results. dynamics v6.05 (cuda), dynamics v6.11 (cuda31) and dynamics v6.06 (cuda30), are involved, all with process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255). All cards are involved, 240, 250, 470, 480 NVIDIA. ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!
	ID: 18918 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1620 Credit: 8,887,306,939 RAC: 19,859,836 Level Scientific publications	Message 18925 - Posted: 13 Oct 2010 \| 14:01:36 UTC - in response to Message 18890.
	One of my 9800GTs had a go at h230r2-TONI_KKi4-0-200-RND9586, but unfortunately crashed with an assertion failure at the bitter end, after more than 24 hours of work. C'est la vie. This 9800GT host really doesn't like KKi4 - now failed g105r2-TONI_KKi4-6-200-RND6062 with the same SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [frc_sum_kernel] [700] Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 121 error message. At least it only wasted 22 Ksec this time.
	ID: 18925 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 19161 - Posted: 1 Nov 2010 \| 1:13:34 UTC - in response to Message 18925.
	This WU might be bad, http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=2016815
	ID: 19161 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : New batch KKi4

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate