Relation run time -> Credit

Message boards : Number crunching : Relation run time -> Credit

Author	Message
leprechaun Send message Joined: 22 Jun 09 Posts: 8 Credit: 45,224,378 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21969 - Posted: 6 Sep 2011 \| 16:54:49 UTC
	Big differences in proportion to the run time of single WU with the Credits has struck me Example normal WU: 286 IBUCH Runtime 10.568 sec Credits 4.157 159 KASHIF Runtime 14.960 sec Credits 8.893 427 KASHIF Runtime 16.738 sec Credits 19.233 For about 6,000 sec more run time there is nearly 5 times more in Credits. This is the disproportion. With Long run WU is no significant difference. One more thing has struck me. If I make about one browser play GPU Load often decreases up to 8% or almost up to the shutdown. Close or minimise I the browser window it goes again normally. Driver is 275.33.
	ID: 21969 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 20 Jul 08 Posts: 134 Credit: 23,657,183 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21970 - Posted: 6 Sep 2011 \| 17:09:36 UTC - in response to Message 21969. Last modified: 6 Sep 2011 \| 17:09:52 UTC
	Big differences in proportion to the run time of single WU with the Credits has struck me Moin Werner, I've lust asked a similar question here, and got kind of an answer. I can't say anything about the browser problem though. ____________ Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki
	ID: 21970 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

leprechaun Send message Joined: 22 Jun 09 Posts: 8 Credit: 45,224,378 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21971 - Posted: 6 Sep 2011 \| 17:17:08 UTC
	Thank you Uwe. I hadn't seen the contribution. With Foldimg@home the problem with the browser doesn't appear. GPU Load always 99%.
	ID: 21971 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Relation run time -> Credit

//