Message boards : Number crunching : No new work for cuda 4.2
Author | Message |
---|---|
I have a GTX550Ti and according to skgiven this is better for cuda 4.2 than cuda 3.1 tasks. I can confirm that as a cuda 3.1 WU takes 41xxx seconds to complete. | |
ID: 28640 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
This machine with 550Ti and driver 306.97 can do cuda 4.2 as it did 2 beta's today that finished good and a third beta is in process. | |
ID: 28646 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you're not getting the short 4.2 it's because there isn't any, the server status page is inaccurate. | |
ID: 28647 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you're not getting the short 4.2 it's because there isn't any, the server status page is inaccurate. I don't belief this unless I hear it from a project member like Nathan of GDF. Looking at the server status page several times a day, I see all numbers changing, so it is updating. And moreover Nathan mentioned that they had a whole lot new WU's. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28650 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
If you're not getting the short 4.2 it's because there isn't any, the server status page is inaccurate. There must be something wrong with the short queue, then. Because I also don't get tasks from it and that's why I've enabled the long queue for now, which seems to work well. ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28651 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have updated to the latest nVidia driver 314.07, cuda version 5000 for the GTX550Ti. | |
ID: 28653 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have updated to the latest nVidia driver 314.07, cuda version 5000 for the GTX550Ti. I also get one in a while, but it's not consistent. I mean I should get a new task before the current one finishes crunching, or sometimes just after it finishes. That's not the case here... Even after hitting the "Update" button once in an hour, it still reports no tasks available for short queue 4.2 If it was a driver issue, I wouldn't get any tasks at all. Also, the long queue works just fine here. It's just the short one that's causing problems so more things point to server side issue PS: I'm using driver 310.19 on Linux ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28655 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Guys.... | |
ID: 28666 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The server does not know which driver you have installed and it doesn't care which driver you have installed. This is not true. I have had many occasions for several projects for AMD as well as nVidia cards that BOINC tells that I need to update my drivers to get work. And indeed after an update I got work then. Indeed a lot of crunchers think that server pages from all projects lies. And indeed I understand how it works. You can also see how many crunchers are active, how many computers and how many Gigaflops, and do the calculation. Or there are many many more computers and crunchers and perhaps even teraflops, the pages are lying did you know. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28668 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The server does not know which driver you have installed and it doesn't care which driver you have installed. OK, I might be wrong about the driver but what I said about the number of tasks in the queue is correct. And if you will think about how the server can say there are (for example) 1000 tasks in the queue and then your host requests work and the server says "no tasks available" well then you see the server does lie. First it says there are tasks, the next second it says there are none. Obviously it cannot be that there are tasks and that there are not tasks simultaneously so obviously the server lies. If you look near the upper left corner of the Server Status page it gives the server software version number and a time. That is the time the queue totals were last counted. Notice that the time almost never matches the time you clicked the Server Status link. If what I am saying is not true then what is your explanation for why the server says there are tasks but you cannot get one? Also, why does it say in your log "no tasks available" instead of "update your driver"? ____________ BOINC <<--- credit whores, pedants, alien hunters | |
ID: 28670 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
And if you think I am mistaken then note that there are least 40 other regular readers/posters here who would correct me if I am wrong on this matter and you will note that none of them do. OK, I'm one of them. I haven't up until now, because most of your mis-statements are tiresome rather than fundamentally wrong, but since you've started claiming detailed knowledge, we'd better start picking a few apart. Driver versions: BOINC servers most certainly do both know and care about driver versions. The easiest project to see this on is Einstein, where the server logs are just a click away, and you can read many messages like 117518. Server status page: the time in the top left corner is the time the page content was rendered into HTML on the server. If you refresh the page (F5 in my browser), it changes. [Edit: at this project - other projects vary] However, it is correct that the task counts are collected periodically by a background daemon and stored, and the displayed statistics are taken from the most recent daemon run. I have no idea whether this project has configured the daemon run interval to be 10 minutes - it seems plausible. But to categorise that slight lag in updating as 'lying' is way too far over the top. Tasks on this project run for several hours: to suggest that every single active computer on the project (your 5,000 figure) has collected new work in the last ten minutes, when currently only about 25% of users have been active in the last 24 hours, is absurd - and removes all credibility from the points you are trying to make. | |
ID: 28671 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thank you, Richard, for correcting some of the details I've got wrong. You seem to think that makes me entirely wrong so do explain why TJ sees tasks in the queue on the Server Status page but cannot get a task. | |
ID: 28675 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I agree with Dagorath, please do tell, you seem to be more informed than either of us and I'm sure there has to be a reason other than just drivers. | |
ID: 28679 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I lost during the reinstall nvidia driver, 3 long tasks of course im lost rac for them..sad.. | |
ID: 28695 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Jozef J | |
ID: 28696 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thank you, Richard, for correcting some of the details I've got wrong. You seem to think that makes me entirely wrong so do explain why TJ sees tasks in the queue on the Server Status page but cannot get a task. Because they are not there - some WU's were removed manually because they were failing/causing problems, as announced here. Presumably when WU's are added to the queue the queue count gets told that 5000 (or whatever the number is) have been added. While it can deal with WU addition, begin sent, server aborted... the Ready To Send Queue is not designed to deal with WU's being manually removed by the researchers, so it probably became inaccurate. Perhaps they would have been better moving them to the Result Deletion Queue, rather than manually deleting them? Anyway, at least one queue is likely to be removed and this isn't the normal situation. Testing appears to still be underway with several app versions being used over the different queues. The queues will probably be corrected after the testing or experiment seeding is over. Normally the server status page is accurate to within a few tasks (<10). ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help | |
ID: 28698 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Not there, uh huh. Well, I apologize if this ruffles feathers but where I come from if it says tasks are there when they're not there then it's lying. Some say it's telling "porkies" and that's fine, you know whatever slang works for you, here we call it lying. Not suggesting somebody should be taken out and whipped over it, not saying all operations must cease until it's fixed, just saying it's not truthing i.e. it's lying. If this same situation should occur again in the future and nobody is providing the detailed explanation and guys are needlessly flailing around with driver upgrades... would it be OK if I say something like "the server is not truthing again"? Would that be less offensive? | |
ID: 28702 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
To me lying is intentionally trying to deceive. I'd say in this case it's simply a mistake, an error with no intention of deception. BOINC client/server has many problems, some far far worse than this. I doubt many of them are intentional. | |
ID: 28703 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). | |
ID: 28709 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Only as info: Very soon we run out of long queue Work ;) | |
ID: 28711 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). Can't speak for TJ, but me I'm getting short tasks consistently now :) ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28713 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). Hello MrS, Yes I get tasks consistently. Directly after I did a clean install of the driver and a reboot I got them (cuda42). They take 25xxx to 26xxx seconds on the 550Ti. No BOINC didn't came with a driver this time (306.97 should do it as it ran beta's (cuda42) consistently. Some off topic information: On another pc with GTX285 I get consistently cuda31 WU's, they run 16xxx to 17xxx seconds. On the 550Ti they took 40xxx seconds. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28717 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). My GTX 560 takes 19xxx to crunch a short 4.2 WU under Linux. ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28736 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks for the updates, guys. So in this case it really seemed to be some weird driver issue! | |
ID: 28738 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks for the updates, guys. So in this case it really seemed to be some weird driver issue! Not on my side, though. I didn't change drivers at all but work started flowing after one of the scientists submitted 1000 WUs to the short 4.2 queue. ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28742 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks for the updates, guys. So in this case it really seemed to be some weird driver issue! And it could be that at the same time I coincidentally did the driver update. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28743 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Now that that is settled... we still aren't sure if this server (GPUgrid server) will refuse to send tasks due to the driver on the host being "unacceptable", however you want to define unacceptable. It appears Einstein's server is configured to do so but that doesn't mean this project's server is. Can anybody verify it or think of a quick and easy way to test it? I suppose one could install an unacceptable driver and see if they still receive tasks. In fact I would do such a test but I'm not sure which driver(s) might be deemed unacceptable and I don't want to flail about with guesses. | |
ID: 28752 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Now that that is settled... we still aren't sure if this server (GPUgrid server) will refuse to send tasks due to the driver on the host being "unacceptable", however you want to define unacceptable. It appears Einstein's server is configured to do so but that doesn't mean this project's server is. Can anybody verify it or think of a quick and easy way to test it? I suppose one could install an unacceptable driver and see if they still receive tasks. In fact I would do such a test but I'm not sure which driver(s) might be deemed unacceptable and I don't want to flail about with guesses. My i7, BOINC 7.0.28, GTX285 with driver 280.xx did not get beta's and short runs from CUDA 3.1 and 4.2. BOINC came with the message that I must update my drivers to get new work. Thus 280.xx driver is a good "test" one but in my case with a GTX285. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28763 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How come one of the "short" queues on the server status page has 10,000+ WUs, but I can't seem to get any of them? I'm running the long WUs fine. | |
ID: 28766 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The server is configured to check the driver version against its CUDA support level, in order to avoid sending WUs to clients which couldn't execute the corresponding app. That should basically be a simple "if driver > xxx then send work" statement. | |
ID: 28769 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How come one of the "short" queues on the server status page has 10,000+ WUs, but I can't seem to get any of them? I'm running the long WUs fine. Indeed top is cuda31 and the second is cuda42. This is the same order as on the compute preferences settings. So the 10000+ are the cuda42 ones. The server can see (I think) for which WU the GPU is best. I get only long runs on my GTX285 when I disable all the others. Edit; MrS posted when I was typing... Edit 2, Thanks MrS. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28770 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How come one of the "short" queues on the server status page has 10,000+ WUs, but I can't seem to get any of them? I'm running the long WUs fine. Are you sure? According to Nate in the News forum, the top one is the 4.2 queue http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3298&nowrap=true#28658 ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28771 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
So, were out of long runs now? Any idea when we'll be getting more? | |
ID: 28777 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We seem to have dried up on short WUs. Can we get some more? Thanks | |
ID: 28793 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Perhaps there is something not quite good with the server. I got these messages from time to time (when I was not watching the pc): | |
ID: 28796 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Pretty sure as it is mentioned in several posts that the cuda42 is faster then the cuda31. And looking at the server state page and the time WU's are sent back, the fastest must be the cuda42. Or I might have missed something. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28797 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I wasn't talking about which is fastest, rather about which queue is which. According to Nate, the 4.2 queue is the top one in Server Status. ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28798 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
This is all I get: | |
ID: 28809 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sure, it can say "no tasks available for long runs" in Event Log and then 5 minutes later you receive a long run. One explanation is that there are in fact none available when you request one but a few minutes later someone returns an errored result so then a resend is made available. Or there are none available then someone returns a success result which allows the server to generate a new task based on that success result (since they generate some tasks "on the fly", IIUC). | |
ID: 28885 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it again dried out :( | |
ID: 28956 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it again dried out :( You can do the 3.1 then, they take longer on my 550Ti, but it keeps the RAC flowing. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28964 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it again dried out :( Can't. They all error out on my GTX 560. I have the long queue enabled and am crunching a TONI one. Let's see how it goes. ____________ Team Belgium | |
ID: 28966 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it again dried out :( I don't have absolutely no knowledge of all the differences in the cards and what they can and can't. I thought that the higher the number the better but that is not true. My GTX285 does faster than the GTX550Ti. But it could be the driver? I had some issues as I mentioned in another thread and updated to 314.97 now the GTX550Ti does all 4 types of WU's. The long ones error out but we now know why. Just a thought to update drivers. I normally don't do that when things run smooth. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
ID: 28975 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There's over 2200 people hammering the long queue and only 323 on the short one. Now that's greed for ya, they just can't let their RAC's slip down. | |
ID: 28982 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My machine with twin GTX590's is not getting any GPUGRID work. the reply to BOINC's request for work is, no work available for short or long. What's up with this? The server status page says, there are plenty of wu's available to send. Are others having the same problem? Rick | |
ID: 29016 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There's over 2200 people hammering the long queue and only 323 on the short one. Now that's greed for ya, they just can't let their RAC's slip down. That that could be seen as a project issue. If they want people to run the short WUs, then make the credits equivalent. Simple. | |
ID: 29017 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We're all having problems Rick, the server polls the queue every hour or so when new wu's get generated and dumped in they go pretty quickly. They pulled most of the NOELIA's because they had major issue's. | |
ID: 29018 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks for the reply flashawk. Times are tuff all over, SETI@Home can't download wu's fast enough, and GPUGRID is running out of work. I guess Donate@home, and World Comunitee Grid will get some bonus donations from my hungry for work machines:) Rick | |
ID: 29019 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We've dried out again... | |
ID: 29145 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Number crunching : No new work for cuda 4.2