Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Extremly "big" WU (when uploading finished WU)

Author Message
Riil
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 08
Posts: 3
Credit: 350,847
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 7314 - Posted: 10 Mar 2009 | 8:24:03 UTC

Hello.
Got 10 WUs done so far, but i've seen this kind of situation for the first time. I let work my machine overnight to finish on of my WUs.
WU NAME :up2078-SMD_v10b1COM74-0-1-ignasi_0
TASK ID: 374560
WU ID: 283841
WU was crunched correctly. The problem is that this exact part of this WU (up2078-SMD_v10b1COM74-0-1-ignasi_0_4) was "only" 83,13 MB !!! So i don't know if it's OK or not. As far as i remember previous WU werent that big (something like 5MB at most ?) Or maybe recently WUs are that big when uploading result to the server. Any explanation ?
Thx in advance

Scott Brown
Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 08
Posts: 144
Credit: 2,973,555
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 7320 - Posted: 10 Mar 2009 | 14:24:03 UTC - in response to Message 7314.

Ignasi noted in another thread that some of the SMD type were going to have a much larger size than previous work, so this is probably the case here.


Riil
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 08
Posts: 3
Credit: 350,847
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 7323 - Posted: 10 Mar 2009 | 19:02:00 UTC - in response to Message 7320.

Thx Scott. Found Ignasi's post finally. Seems i was one of these 200 lucky crunchers.

ignasi
Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 08
Posts: 254
Credit: 16,836,000
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 7346 - Posted: 11 Mar 2009 | 16:11:46 UTC - in response to Message 7323.

Yes. Those generating the *_4 file are by that file higher, but definitely it shouldn't be that much.

I am looking at it again.

Once again, sorry for that.
i

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Extremly "big" WU (when uploading finished WU)

//